Exercise regulation on lower body positive pressure treadmills Does body weight % matter
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined physiological responses between 70% (70) and 90% (90) body weight at RPE of 4 and 7. Methods: Fifteen college-aged participants completed a VO2peak test followed by two experimental sessions, one at 70 and one at 90. The OMNI pictorial RPE scale was used to select LBBPT velocity and grade (participants were blinded to the treadmill screen) to produce RPEs of 4 and 7 at 70 and 90. Following RPE-based intensity selection four, 5-min running bouts assessed physiological responses. Paired samples t-tests determined whether physiological outcomes differed between 70 and 90 at the same RPE. Cohen’s d were calculated for all dependent variables. Results: No differences were seen in VO2 (p > .05) at both an RPE of 4 (70 = 25.6 ml/kg/min; 90 = 24.8 ml/kg/min) and 7 (70 = 33.3 ml/kg/min; 90 = 32.1 ml/kg/min), HR at RPE of 4 (70 = 144.1bpm; 90 = 149. 5 bpm) and 7 (70 = 164.3bpm; 90 = 163.4bpm), or RER at RPE of 4 (70 = 0.85; 90 = 0.85) and 7 (70 = 0.93; 90 = 0.93). Conclusion: RPE allowed consistent intensity regulation across lower body weight percentages while exercising on a LBPPT.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
American College of Sports Medicine. (2017). ACSM's exercise testing and prescription (10th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Barnes, K. R., & Janecke, J. N. (2017). Physiological and biomechanical responses of highly trained distance runners to lower-body positive pressure treadmill running. Sports Medicine - Open, 3(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-017-0108-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-017-0108-x
Ceci, R., & Hassmén, P. (1991). Self-monitored exercise at three different RPE intensities in treadmill vs field running. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 23(6), 732–738. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199106000-00013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199106000-00013
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunbar, C. C., Robertson, R. J., Baun, R., Blandin, M. F., Metz, K., Burdett, R., & Goss, F. L. (1992). The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 24(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199201000-00016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199201000-00016
Farina, K. A., Wright, A. A., Ford, K. R., Wirfel, L. A., & Smoliga, J. M. (2017). Physiological and biomechanical responses to running on lower body positive pressure treadmills in healthy populations. Sports Medicine, 47(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0581-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0581-2
Gojanovic, B., Cutti, P., Shultz, R., & Matheson, G. O. (2012). Maximal physiological parameters during partial body-weight support treadmill testing. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(10), 1935–1941. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825a5d1f DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825a5d1f
Gojanovic, B., Shultz, R., Feihl, F., & Matheson, G. O. (2015). Overspeed HIIT in lower-body positive pressure treadmill improves running performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(12), 2571–2578. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000707
Grabowski, A. M. (2010). Metabolic and biomechanical effects of velocity and weight support using a lower-body positive pressure device during walking. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(6), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.02.007
Green, J. M., Crews, T. R., Bosak, A. M., & Peveler, W. (2002). Physiological responses at 0% and 10% treadmill incline using the RPE estimation-production paradigm. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 42(1), 8–13.
Hoffman, M. D., & Donaghe, H. E. (2011). Physiological responses to body weight-supported treadmill exercise in healthy adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(6), 960–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.035
Kang, J., Hoffman, J. R., Walker, H., Chaloupka, E. C., & Utter, A. C. (2003). Regulating intensity using perceived exertion during extended exercise periods. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 89(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0811-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0811-9
Kline, J. R., Raab, S., Coast, J. R., Bounds, R. G., McNeill, D. K., & de Heer, H. D. (2015). Conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(3), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000658
Kristiansen, M., Odderskær, N., & Kristensen, D. H. (2019). Effect of body weight support on muscle activation during walking on a lower body positive pressure treadmill. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 48, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.021
Kurz, M. J., Corr, B., Stuberg, W., Volkman, K. G., & Smith, N. (2011). Evaluation of lower body positive pressure supported treadmill training for children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 23(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318227b737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318227b737
Lee, K. Y., Han, J. Y., Kim, J. H., Kim, D. J., & Choi, I. S. (2016). Physiological responses during the lower body positive pressure supported treadmill test. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(5), 915–923. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.915
McNeill, D. K., Kline, J. R., de Heer, H. D., & Coast, J. R. (2015). Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill®. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 14(2), 333–339.
Morgan, W. P. (1981). The 1980 C. H. McCloy research lecture: Psychophysiology of self-awareness during vigorous physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52(3), 385–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1981.10607886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1981.10607886
Noble, B. J. (1982). Clinical applications of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 14(5), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00016
Pritchett, R. C., Green, J. M., Wickwire, P. J., & Kovacs, M. S. (2009). Acute and session RPE responses during resistance training: Bouts to failure at 60% and 90% of 1RM. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2009/v21i1a304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2009/v21i1a304
Raffalt, P. C., Hovgaard-Hansen, L., & Jensen, B. R. (2013). Running on a lower-body positive pressure treadmill: VO₂max, respiratory response, and vertical ground reaction force. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2013.784721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2013.784721
Sainton, P., Nicol, C., Cabri, J., Barthelemy-Montfort, J., Berton, E., & Chavet, P. (2015). Influence of short-term unweighing and reloading on running kinetics and muscle activity. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 115(5), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-3095-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-3095-3
Stoudemire, N. M., Wideman, L., Pass, K. A., McGinnis, C. L., Gaesser, G. A., & Weltman, A. (1996). The validity of regulating blood lactate concentration during running by ratings of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 28(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199604000-00014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199604000-00014
Utter, A. C., Robertson, R. J., Green, J. M., Suminski, R. R., McAnulty, S. R., & Nieman, D. C. (2004). Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36(10), 1776–1780. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000142310.97274.94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000142310.97274.94